Disclaimer POLITICAL ADVERTISEMENT * The sponsor is Zentiva * The advertisement is linked to policy advocacy around the challenges faced by the off-patent medicines industry, in particular the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive. More information here

Sanna Marin is a Tony Blair Institute’s strategic counselor. She’s the former prime minister of Finland. As the world’s leaders gather in Rome for this year’s Ukraine Recovery Conference, there is no illusion as to what’s at stake. Ending Russia’s war of aggression remains Ukraine’s overriding priority. But the truth is, even that won’t secure lasting stability. True recovery will demand more than reconstruction funds or military deterrence. It will require deep, sustained investment in the systems that underpin a strong sovereign state. One of the most vital — and most overlooked — of those systems is Ukraine’s own people. Too often, the conversation surrounding Ukraine’s workforce begins and ends with refugee return. But recovery cannot be deferred until people come home. Nor can it depend entirely on external support. Ukraine’s greatest untapped asset is already within its borders: millions of citizens ready to work, retrain and rebuild, if allowed the opportunity. This isn’t a soft-side issue — it’s a strategic imperative. And new research from the Tony Blair Institute shows that taking bold action now could expand Ukraine’s workforce by 25 percent, even while war continues. There are more than 3 million people inside Ukraine today who, with the right policies and support, could be brought into the workforce. Unlocking this potential isn’t just the most realistic way to stimulate economic growth and power Ukraine’s recovery, it’s also the smartest and fastest way to build long-term resilience in the face of ongoing war. This isn’t about abstractions. It’s about mothers who can’t find childcare; displaced people struggling to rebuild their lives after being forced to flee; job seekers struggling to find work that matches their skills and offers the stability that formal employment should provide. It’s also about veterans and individuals with disabilities who are ready to contribute but often encounter barriers due to limited workplace accommodation. Ukraine’s workforce is motivated, but it’s constrained by systems that haven’t kept up. Today, 83 percent of Ukrainians with disabilities are out of work. Women face a 15-point participation gap compared to men. And over one-third of internally displaced people are unemployed. Meanwhile, 40 percent of businesses say they can’t find the skilled talent they need. This mismatch is more than a missed opportunity — it’s a risk to Ukraine’s recovery and long-term sovereignty. Ukraine’s greatest untapped asset is already within its borders: millions of citizens ready to work, retrain and rebuild, if allowed the opportunity. | Sergey Kozlov/EPA The good news is, Ukraine has the tools to change this, and the country has momentum on its side: billions in donor support, a nearly finalized new labor code and real political will. It has digital infrastructure that’s the envy of governments across Europe. It also has a population ready to adapt, with almost 40 percent of Ukraine’s unemployed saying they’re willing to retrain and a quarter of them willing relocate for the right job. That’s an extraordinary national resource. And Ukraine’s partners can help turn this potential into progress by acting on four fronts: First, bring Ukraine’s job market into the 21st century. The country is already a world leader in digital ID. It has ambitious plans to build platforms that would match workers with jobs and training opportunities — especially in regions where the disconnect between supply and demand is stark. It needs international funding and expertise to do this.  Second, put employers in the driver’s seat by tying every reskilling program to a real job opportunity. Even though there are hundreds of available courses, many teach skills that businesses don’t need, or they target workers who already have jobs instead of those seeking work. Reskilling support should be contingent upon employers co-designing curriculums and committing to hire successful graduates. Third, finalize the new labor code. The current one dates back to 1971. Reform is essential — not just for EU accession but for unlocking flexibility, formality and fairness in the workplace. Technical assistance and public advocacy from international partners can help here. Finally, break down the systemic barriers to participation. This means scaling up access to childcare, improving workplace accessibility for those with disabilities and supporting underrepresented groups, from women and young people to the elderly and displaced. These changes are morally right, economically vital and should align with donor priorities. I’m proud to join that conversation, and urge us all to keep people — not just infrastructure — at the heart of recovery. Of course, the return of refugees will be critical to Ukraine’s long-term recovery. But with only half of them currently planning on returning, and most of them uncertain exactly when, this cannot be the cornerstone of today’s strategy. Ukraine cannot afford to wait. The focus must be on unlocking the potential of those already inside the country’s borders. And that starts with modernizing the job market, removing the barriers that prevent people from working, and investing in the skills that will power Ukraine’s reconstruction from the ground up. Recovery doesn’t begin with return, it begins with reform. Ukraine has already proven its courage. Now its people can build a workforce ready to win the peace. But the country needs partners to expedite this task and help its people scale with what they have. With the right investment, Ukrainians won’t just rebuild — they’ll lead.

LONDON — Government minister Lucy Powell has spoken out after a member of parliament was forced to leave a crucial late-night debate because the batteries in her hearing aids were running out. Labour MP Naz Shah, who sits on a committee that is scrutinizing the assisted dying bill currently before the U.K. parliament, expressed frustration that lengthy sessions meant she could not recharge her hearing aids. “Hearing isn’t a choice for me,” Shah posted on social media Tuesday night after having to leave the chamber. “I’ve raised this issue repeatedly with members of the committee and it’s sad that I’m unable to continue today.” Powell, the leader of the House of Commons, told POLITICO that “we cannot have” a situation where MPs who wear hearing aids or who are prevented from sitting for long hours for other reasons are excluded from proceedings. Powell, who is launching a new inquiry into how to make the parliament more accessible, confirmed the study would examine the challenges posed by long sittings in the Commons. “Sitting for lengthy debates or long bill committees has been one of the big things raised with us already by MPs who have disabilities or impairments,” she said. A spokesperson for Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who is in charge of the assisted dying bill, said the committee needs to sit late to get the bill done and free up its members for other commitments. INACCESSIBLE ESTATE PROBED The accessibility inquiry launched Thursday will be carried out by the modernization committee. That’s a new cross-party group set up shortly after Labour took office last year to review the working practices of the often-antiquated House of Commons.  Much of the parliamentary estate is inaccessible for wheelchairs or for those with limited mobility. Disabled staff and MPs have in the past complained of a shortage of accessible toilets and the lack of flexibility in the Commons chamber, where MPs often have to sit without moving for hours at a time. A spokesperson for Labour MP Kim Leadbeater said the committee needs to sit late to get the bill done and free up its members for other commitments. | Carl Court/Getty Images The committee will call for views on making the parliamentary estate more accessible to disabled people and making daily business easier to understand. It will cover physical improvements that could be made to the Palace of Westminster separately from a wider restoration project, which is currently in limbo ahead of a vote later this year. Powell identified a host of changes that could be made sooner, such as redesigning heavy doors and making reasonable adjustments to MPs’ offices or the location of their offices. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING The committee is also expected to focus on areas where there is a gap between the technical language used in the chamber and the public’s understanding.  Powell highlighted the example of “private members’ bills,” which some have argued should be renamed “backbench” or “non-government” bills to avoid confusion. She said the committee wants to address “accessibility for the public” where the “names given to things … are not easily understandable for what they actually are.” The inquiry is not expected to address etiquette in the chamber, which forbids MPs from using “you” to address others — and bans accusations of lying or hypocrisy. But it may consider dropping the use of “chairman” in favor of the gender-neutral “chair.”  The Commons leader admitted that while many of these issues had been a source of concern at Westminster for years, the influx of new MPs at last year’s election had helped create an appetite for change. Powell said: “We’ve heard from new MPs in particular and new members of staff, who have just found some things that we [do] aren’t really acceptable in the modern age, and so if that’s not the job of a modernization committee, then what is?”