SOLIDARITY BEGINS WHERE WE ACKNOWLEDGE THAT OUR WITHDRAWAL AND ESCAPISM HAS
CONSEQUENCES FOR OTHERS
~ Lola, Barrikade ~
Partyvism is not a music genre, not a subculture. It’s an attitude. The
conscious or unconscious practice of suppressing societal tensions through
constant partying, scene consumption, and escapism, while minimising or
completely outsourcing political participation. Partying is experienced not as a
supplement, but as a substitute for engagement, organisation, and
responsibility.
As the rightward shift accelerates, militarisation is ruthlessly pursued,
authoritarian policies become mainstream, crises escalate, people are
systematically exploited and slaughtered for resource colonialism, and genocides
continue or are relativised — a segment of the scene withdraws. Partyvism is not
a harmless side effect; it’s dancing rather than fighting, intoxication rather
than solidarity, the scene rather than organising.
The problem isn’t partying itself. The problem is partying as a substitute
activity. Partyvism transforms collective powerlessness into short-term ecstasy
and sells it as freedom. While others use all their resources to build
structures, mitigate repression, support those affected, and fend off attacks, a
large segment remains on the margins, often politically informed, but rarely
practically involved.
This isn’t about condemning partying. Joy, physicality, intoxication, and
community are legitimate needs. Many people are exhausted, overwhelmed,
psychologically burdened, or simply preoccupied with surviving their daily lives
because they are oppressed by the system day after day. Maximum participation
cannot be demanded of anyone at all times. Those who ignore this reproduce
precisely the performance-driven and exploitative logics that helped create
these crises.
But: Those who systematically stay out of it leave the field to others and
indirectly profit from their work. Partyvism shifts responsibility downwards and
risks outwards. It thrives on others taking the fall. No one owes permanent
activism. But there is a difference between taking breaks and permanently
withdrawing. Between self-protection and political complacency.
The illusion that one can simply stay out of it is deceptive. As if one’s own
body, one’s own scene, or the club were an apolitical space. But the shift to
the right doesn’t stop at the door, repression doesn’t bypass dance floors, and
political decisions affect us all, whether we’re partying or not. Solidarity
cannot be postponed or relegated to after-hours parties.
This is how invisible hierarchies emerge: Some organise, others consume. Some
slowly burn out. This isn’t subculture; this is political division of labour
without consultation, always at the expense of those who stay.
The question isn’t whether we’re allowed to celebrate, but what for. Whether
spaces are merely places of distraction or places where relationships are forged
that will sustain us when things get serious. Whether pleasure is connected or
becomes an excuse.
Solidarity also means asking ourselves: Who keeps the structures running? Who
pays the price for political passivity? Who can even afford escapism?
Not everyone has to do everything. But no one is completely uninvolved.
Solidarity begins where we acknowledge that our withdrawal has consequences for
others. That our escapism generates real costs and creates real imbalances: Some
keep struggles going while others consume. Some burn out while others dance.
This is rarely malicious intent, but it weakens movements and deepens isolation.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Machine translation
The post Partyvism appeared first on Freedom News.
Tag - Switzerland
ACTION MEDICS REPORT FROM RECENT DEMOS IN SWITZERLAND
~ Sanitätskollektiv Zürich ~
Between 17 and 20 January 2026, Sanitätskollektiv Zürich provided independent
medical support at three demonstrations in Bern, Zurich and Winterthur. Across
these protests — against the World Economic Forum (WEF) and in solidarity with
Rojava — we observed extensive police deployments, the repeated use of force,
and, in Bern in particular, systematic obstruction of medical access to injured
people.
On 17 January, three of our medics accompanied the unpermitted Smash-WEF
demonstration in Bern. A march was prevented from going ahead by a massive
police operation involving barrier vehicles, batons, pepper spray and fists.
More than one hundred people were held for hours in a police kettle. Throughout
the deployment we repeatedly observed disproportionate police action, which also
denied us access to injured people.
Even before the planned start at 3 p.m., numerous police units were present at
Bern main station, carrying out identity checks. When the assembly formed on the
station square, Bern cantonal police announced that only a static rally would be
tolerated and that a march would be prevented. Several hundred officers, barrier
vehicles and water cannons then sealed off the area.
The demonstration was forced to circle within the police cordon and was
gradually pushed towards the Church of the Holy Spirit, where it was kettled
from around 4 p.m. Police then carried out multiple, sometimes violent, arrests.
A detained person reported the use of rubber bullets fired at short distance
from barrier vehicles inside the kettle. Demonstrators were pressed together by
police vehicles, pepper spray was used against people in the kettle, and after
our deployment ended we continued to receive messages from people injured by
pepper spray near the station.
On 19 January, four of our medics supported two demonstrations in Zurich: the
authorised “Trump not welcome” march, attended by around 3,000 people, and a
subsequent unpermitted protest in solidarity with Rojava. During the authorised
demonstration there were no injuries. However, police presence was strikingly
heavy compared to other demonstrations of similar size, with even small side
streets blocked by barrier vehicles and water cannons positioned pre-emptively.
After the final rally at Helvetiaplatz, around 800 people — led by a Kurdish and
a revolutionary bloc — set off on another march. Following an accident involving
a sound truck, which we treated on site, the march developed into a street
blockade. Police issued dispersal orders and then deployed water cannons, some
jets directed at specific groups. When objects and pyrotechnics were thrown by a
small number of demonstrators, police additionally used irritants and rubber
bullets.
As a result of the extensive use of force, several people were injured. To
dissolve a peaceful demonstration with tear gas projectiles and high-pressure
water jets is, in our view, not proportionate.
On 20 January, three of our medics accompanied a peaceful demonstration in
solidarity with Rojava in Winterthur, attended by families with children.
Without warning or audible instructions, police fired blank shots from launchers
at 6:45 p.m. and again later at close range, and deployed pepper spray. When
demonstrators were pressed close to police lines, irritants and physical force
were used without any apparent opportunity to leave the situation.
We treated a low double-digit number of patients for eye and respiratory
irritation, panic attacks and brief losses of consciousness. One person was
handed over to the ambulance service.
Across all three days, a clear pattern emerged: heavy policing, early
escalation, and in Bern the outright denial of medical access. These practices
endanger demonstrators and undermine both the right to protest and the provision
of urgent medical care.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Machine-assisted edit from Barrikade.info
The post Repression at WEF and Rojava protests appeared first on Freedom News.
WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM OPENS WITH POWER-CUT AND GRAFFITI AGAINST THE ELITE “DEATH
CULT”
~ Cristina Sykes ~
Shut the System says its activists this morning sabotaged snow machines at the
Davos ski resort, where the World Economic Forum (WEF) opens tomorrow (20
January).
The group said its “saboteurs cut power cables supplying snow machines across
the Jakobshorn and Parsenns mountainsides. They used natural pigment to write
blood-red messages alongside the ski runs stating: ‘Summit of Delusion’ and
‘Blood In Your Wallets'”.
In a press release the group described the Forum as a “death cult” for political
and business elites, and noted that “Davos uses machines to create fake snow
because global warming prevents that happening naturally”.
In 2020, WEF stated that missing the 2ºC target for global warming would mean
“climate apocalypse”. The group said the 2ºC limit is “impossible for the 1% to
contemplate because any legitimate pathway for limiting global warming threatens
their disproportionate wealth and power.”
There was no immediate confirmation.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Photos from Shut the System.
The post StS sabotage snow machines at Davos appeared first on Freedom News.
IT SEEMS LIKE IN THE YEAR 2024, GOVERNMENTS AND THE PEOPLE SUPPORTING THEM HAVE
ACCOMPLISHED THE IMPOSSIBLE IN TERMS OF NORMALISING DEATH—BUT REFUSAL PERSISTS
~ Juju Alerta ~
With a wild demonstration to enliven the St Pauli district of Hamburg, people
from different countries gathered in the city in mid-November to exchange
stories and discussions about the Refusal of Military Service and
Anti-Militarism. People from various countries with experience on the topic
spoke about their particular situations.
PALESTINE/ISRAEL
Spokespeople from the Mesarvot organisation and the New Profile movement, both
active in supporting networks for people refusing the mandatory military service
in Israel shared their experiences and advice. They discussed their own
experiences both of conscientious objection and of being drafted as women. One
younger speaker (age 21) had to go to prison for 87 days for openly refusing to
attend the army in 2022, they supported the suggestion of a public and online
movement. The second spokesperson is of an older generation (age 42) who shares
their own considerations and ideologies for the need for people to keep their
refusal to join the army hidden and private. Both want the scary tales around
the objection to breakout. People fall into pitfalls while being interviewed,
just because they lack the right information, speakers want to harness their
stories to inspire something achievable for everyone affected within a highly
militarised society, especially one using automated technology for genocide. The
Israel Defence Forces have a long history of discrimination when it comes to the
treatment of conscientious objectors (ie. Religious, gender, ethnicity
discrimination).
GREECE
In Greece, both the heroism of refusing conscription combined with invisibility,
creates a social distance to the topic. Often objection is considered to be a
private thing, not something belonging to a political movement. Drafted men
could be undertaking tasks on migratory projects or its militarised borders. The
Greek Army has a presence at the Red Sea and in the Middle East, as well as
being strongly influenced by NATO bases on Greek territories, which might be the
reason why it abstained from a vote calling for an immediate humanitarian truce
between Israel and Hamas, on October 27 2023 at the UN General Assembly.
Financial sanctions can affect individuals refusing to attend the army and
evading the draft for up to 30 years. One example is that freelance workers can
get “force-taxed”. In general, the economic penalties seem common in European
territories, however it is relatively new in Greece compared to Germany. If
someone in Greece needs some months to secure his finances and possessions from
governmental involvement in the case of military service refusal, the same
process would take Germany ten years to do due to its erudite use of
bureaucracy as an oppressive instrument.
The society in Greece in general is in favour of the army, despite of it is
being not such a strong force of a few million people, and even the leftist
parties in Greece seem to not be opposed to it – the communist party being
highly patriotic and not in favour of a revolutionary access to weapons. The
physical training in the army itself in reality is secondary to patriotic
brainwashing and lecturing on how to be a ‘proper man‘.
SWITZERLAND
Switzerland is a good example of an economical beneficiary of military
technology exports, whilst also enjoying living in peace. Surprisingly, they too
have mandatory military service. Objection to conscription costs citizens 3% of
their annual income to military exemption tax, or the seizure of valuable items.
Since the 13th century its general democratic voting system was decisively in
favour of a military, because direct voting campaigns are usually highly
financialised affairs, orchestrated by various lobbies. You also have an option
(or a trap) of civil service to fall into, if you are an ideological objector.
This is an increasingly common way of deterring objectors, by forcing them into
longer drafts of civil service, than expected in the military service
conscription.
The military is seen of more use for internal affairs, so you could compare it
to a highly economically and technologically developed, patriotic, guerrilla
army, where they even have a saying: ”Switzerland doesn’t have an army, it is an
army”. For instance, during the Cold War the army was distributing a manual
titled Total Resistance, that the RAF considered using it (though eventually it
proved not to be that useful to them). The Army’s main operations consist of
securing the border, fighting social movements, and event security, such as at
the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meetings and the Zionist World Congress
(in Basel, 2022).
A curious fact is, that the Swiss Army can refuse to draft you, if it has
profiled you as too subversive for the army. Since it is considered as too easy
to escape the service, it is treated on an individual basis rather than a
collective one.
RUSSIA
On November 17th, Russian anarchists organised a block for an anti-war
demonstration in Berlin, carrying a banner reading “Death to the Empire”. The
fight against the mobilisation in Russia is a fight against destruction of
rights and the authoritarian-conservative politics of Putin during a state of
war. Before, mobilisation to service in the army was largely avoided by people
using any means necessary, as it was seen as an absurd, useless and meaningless
time spent – according to a spokesperson, who avoided mobilisation via
migration. The army was heavily corrupt, so it could be avoided for instance by
buying fake medical documents. Russian society sees it as a cultural rite of
passage for a man to experience violence and trauma, since the army’s nightmare
is constituted through strong hierarchy and discrimination.
Currently, the anti-war charity Go By The Forest helps a lot of deserters from
Russia. The most strict conditions are found at the frontline, in Luhansk and
Donetsk deserters get tortured and detained in illegal secret prisons. Inside
the country itself the laws are becoming increasingly repressive for
conscientious objectors. The war reproduces coloniality through the racialised
mobilisation, mostly ethnic minorities are overwhelmingly sent to die. A big
class difference is also observed within the poorer provinces who populate a
majority of those drafted, as well as lower classes from the cities, which
maintains the status quo. A common practice of the fascist paramilitary Wagner
Group is the illegal mobilisation of prisoners through violent exploitation.
The avoidance of the Russian army prompts existential questions for the affected
since the start of the invasion on Ukraine. There are few possibilities for
challenging Russian conscription, so the attacking of military railroads,
fragging (coined by conscripted Americans who protested the Vietnam War soldiers
by attacking army superiors) and migration became the only possible, but
necessary reactions. Besides, sanctions led to nothing else in reality but a
militarisation of economy, where new technological developments are being tested
to practice.
GERMANY
Overall, the demonstration in Hamburg acts as a good reminder that in Germany
the situation, according to the organisers discussion of various indicators,
could revert to the mandatory military service that existed prior to 2011. A
strong stance is needed to challenge the increased financing and interest in the
military. This situation demands the biggest resistance in Germany since 1945
and this weekend in Hamburg served to inform attendees about possible ways to
act. It seemed that the organisers prepared the questions for the speakers in
advance, and it was interesting to learn, how the patriarchy is shaping the
significance of the military. In the future it would be encouraging to see a
broader perspective and representation on feminist struggles related to warfare,
and to widen the scope of activist participation from other countries. This
could build upon the foundations of including different viewpoints, to garner a
fruitful dialogue.
Instead of enabling the normalisation of necropolitics, we should resist: there
is no speculation on death, and there are no varying degrees of it. Speaking
about war is speaking about death without any compromises. The deadliest of it
could be the human next door, if they do not t care to oppose it. It is worth
the fight against the globalised, capitalised, nationalised State war-machine on
all fronts, even if the possibilities may vastly vary depending on the region in
which the military operates.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top photo: Russian-anarchists-in-exile march at anti-war demonstration on
November 17th in Berlin. Photo: avtonom_org
The post Report from anti-war congress in Hamburg appeared first on Freedom
News.