DIRECT ACTION OPPOSES DEFORESTATION AS YEAR COMES TO A CLOSE
~ Gabriel Fonten ~
On 17 December the Ada’itsx / Fairy Creek Blockade released footage of the
latest raids by Canadian police, who arrested activists camped in the Walbran
Valley in British Columbia. The activists, who have continued to blockade
logging roads despite the damage to their camp by police and harsh weather,
stand as the most recent iteration of a 30 year long campaign to defend Canada’s
old-growth forests in the region. The existing old-growth forest represents just
3% of what existed pre-colonisation and protects some of Canada’s richest
biodiversity and endangered species.
On the other side of the world in Australia, South West Forest Defenders ended
the year with a victory, successfully forcing the cancellation of planned burns
of Mt Clare, Nornalup and Coalmine/Knoll Tingle forest blocks for 2025/26. Their
campaign parallels activists in Canada in many ways: both came to the fore in
the 1990s, oppose the ruthless expansion of the logging industry in their
regions, and have used similar tactics such as blockades, tree-sitting, and mass
civil disobedience. Both have also put forward an alternative understanding of
the forests to the capitalists and politicians they oppose, emphasising shared
responsibility, intertwinement, and indigenous rights to the land that are
incompatible with its current exploitation.
Image: South West Forest Defenders of Facebook
Crucial to both is also their sustained efforts, including when victories are
achieved. In both cases, the Australian and Canadian governments have
compromised with the activists by creating national parks, delaying logging
operations, and cancelling burn plans. Yet campaigns have been ready to continue
when these protections ultimately give way to industry pressure once more. In
both cases this has led to decades of continued struggle, to both win
protections and ensure their enforcement. In the Canadian case, where mass civil
disobedience had been a crucial tactic, this has meant that the campaign to
defend Fairy Creek holds the record for the highest number of arrests in
Canadian history.
In an interview with Canada’s National Observer one organiser at the Fairy Creek
blockade stated that “Blockading is not a marathon; it’s a relay. We just hope
people will be here to pick up the baton”. Both campaigns stand as a testament
to the resilience and longevity needed to stave off the relentless exploitation
of the environment in a capitalist world, even when the pockets of old-growth
forests still left are tiny compared to the expanses already stripped bare.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top image: Fairy Creek Blockade on Facebook (not AI)
The post Forest defence in Canada and Australia appeared first on Freedom News.
Tag - Australia
A new Australian law requires larger companies to declare any ransomware
payments they have made.
JACK ANDREWS WAS AUSTRALIA’S LEADING PROPONENT OF COMMUNIST-ANARCHISM AND A KEY
FIGURE IN THE INTERNATIONAL ANARCHIST MOVEMENT
~ Tom Goyens ~
Born in Bendigo in 1865 to London-born parents, John Arthur Andrews grew up in
Melbourne, where his father worked as chief clerk for the Victoria Mines and
Water Supply Department. As a child, Andrews was frequently bullied at school.
In 1879, he enrolled at Scotch College, graduating two years later. After his
father died in 1882, Andrews took a job in the same department, earning a good
salary. However, he quickly became disillusioned with the work. A budding
writer, he once won a prize for a poem celebrating the eight-hour workday.
Andrews’ growing interest in freethought and socialism further distanced him
from his bureaucratic life. His dissatisfaction peaked in 1886 when he was fired
shortly before Christmas. His physical and mental health deteriorated, and he
may have even considered suicide. In early 1887, he joined the Melbourne
Anarchist Club, though he was initially sceptical of anarchism. After a period
of rest in Dunolly, Andrews returned to the Club as a committed anarchist and
soon became a journalist advocating communist-anarchism.
J.A. Andrews | takver.com
By 1889, Andrews was corresponding with several international anarchist
publications. A polyglot fluent in languages including Latin and Chinese, he
immersed himself in the ideas of Russian revolutionary Peter Kropotkin, whose
works appeared in La Révolte. That same year, Andrews published “Communism and
Communist-Anarchism” in Benjamin Tucker’s Liberty. He argued that revolution was
simply about casting off oppression, not waiting for it to fade away.1 According
to historian Bob James, Andrews also contributed to two Portuguese anarchist
publications.In 1890, a severe economic downturn plunged Australia into
depression, leaving thousands unemployed. Jack Andrews made his way to Sydney,
where he joined German-born anarchist and florist Joseph Schellenberg at his
farm in Smithfield, on the outskirts of the city. Together, they formed a
“Communist Anarchist Group” affiliated with the Australian Socialist League,
issuing a manifesto to promote their ideals.2
That August, Andrews sent a report on the maritime strike to Johann Most, editor
of Freiheit in New York, which was published in October 1890. Andrews believed
Melbourne was on the brink of a general strike and possible revolution, with
anarchists playing a key role in educating workers and running soup kitchens for
the unemployed. Later, Freiheit published Andrews’ essay, “Anarchismus in
Australien,” which he may have translated himself.3 It seemed that the
German-Australian anarchists were the only organised game in town. “There is no
consolidated party whatever to back us up,” he reported, “except in Adelaide
where there is a small group of German Anarchists who contributed £4 [to
Andrews’s periodical Reason] and do their best to push on the circulation in
that city.”4
By early 1892, Jack Andrews faced severe financial hardship and tramped for
months in search of work. Despite his struggles, he remained committed to
writing and anarchist agitation. He established a correspondence with historian
Max Nettlau, a key figure in documenting global anarchism. Andrews’ letters,
written in a candid and personal tone, conveyed the isolation and difficulty of
being an anarchist in Australia. “The movement in Australia,” he wrote, “appears
more disintegrated than it has ever been.”
For Andrews, staying in touch with comrades, both locally and abroad, was not
just a tactical necessity but also a source of psychological support: “if I can
keep in active communication with others interested in the movement it will keep
me going.”
Through these connections, Andrews had access to a range of foreign anarchist
publications, such as El Combate, La Révolte, and Les Temps Nouveaux. In return,
he shared Australian papers and pamphlets with Nettlau and other international
anarchists, contributing to the broader exchange of ideas. His own writings
would soon appear in anarchist publications across Europe and the United States,
keeping his ideas in circulation despite the challenges he faced at home.5
The Labor Call (Melbourne), July 9, 1908
In the early 1890s, Jack Andrews, without steady work, continued his anarchist
agitation by publishing several short-lived papers such as Reason and Revolt,
often produced with minimal resources. He joined the Active Service Brigade in
1893, a radical direct action group for the unemployed, which became a constant
thorn in the side of Australian conservatives. Through both mainstream and
labour presses, Andrews defended anarchism, contributing polemical articles that
challenged the status quo.
In December 1894, Andrews was arrested and charged with seditious libel for his
outspoken writings. Convicted the following year, he served five months in jail,
during which the authorities confiscated all his papers, pamphlets, and drafts,
a significant blow to his efforts.
After his release, Andrews returned to Melbourne and resumed his anarchist work.
In the fall of 1895, he began contributing regularly to Les Temps Nouveaux, the
newly launched anarchist journal edited by Jean Grave, which succeeded La
Révolte. He also became a correspondent for The Firebrand, a prominent
communist-anarchist paper published in Portland, Oregon. For two years, Andrews
provided detailed and lucid articles on anarchist organization, revolution,
property, and communism, as well as reports on the anarchist movement in
Australia. In 1897, The Firebrand even offered Andrews a position on its staff,
but due to financial constraints, he was unable to afford the voyage to the
United States.
Jack Andrews’ correspondence with anarchists across the United States and Europe
revealed the existence of a deeply integrated global anarchist network. His
involvement in this network was vital in linking Australia’s isolated anarchist
movement to the larger global currents of anarchism, despite the practical
challenges he faced. These connections facilitated the constant exchange of
news, ideas, and materials. Editorial offices of anarchist papers functioned not
just as places to produce content but as international clearinghouses, where
printed materials from around the world were reviewed, serialized, translated,
advertised, or forwarded to other periodicals.
A glimpse into the letter-box section of any anarchist paper showcases the
polyglot nature and transnational logistics involved in producing each issue.
Language served as a practical tool for gauging the movement’s reach.
International anarchist news was often categorized by country, but anarchist
publications were typically grouped by language. For instance, the
Italian-language section of anarchist media might include papers from the United
States, Argentina, Tunisia, and Italy.
Translators were essential in this polyglot network, constantly in demand to
bridge linguistic divides. The idea of a centralised translation bureau gained
traction among anarchists and was revived in the mid-1890s by Alfred Sanftleben,
a German anarchist who operated under the name “Slovak.” From his home in
Zürich, Sanftleben established a translation service, placing ads in major
anarchist newspapers like Freiheit, The Firebrand, and Les Temps Nouveaux. His
“office” became a hub for translating and distributing anarchist books and
pamphlets across borders. Andrews made use of this service. In 1896, Sanftleben
wrote to him requesting information on the anarchist movement in Australia,
along with radical papers. Andrews, fluent in French, sent a report in English
to be translated for Les Temps Nouveaux. This report, “Our Movement in
Australia,” was first published in May by The Firebrand in English, and a
condensed French version appeared in Les Temps Nouveaux that July.
Alfred Sanftleben (1871-1952). Kate Sharpley Library
Despite his undeniable talent as a writer and translator, Andrews struggled
financially and never achieved the international prominence of anarchists like
Pietro Gori or Peter Kropotkin. He died of tuberculosis on July 26, 1903, in
Melbourne. His untimely death — he was thirty-eight — cut short a life dedicated
to anarchist ideals, limiting his potential as a global figure within the
movement.
The post Australia’s forgotten global anarchist appeared first on Freedom News.