BRUSSELS — Southern European states are rebuffing a European Commission plan to
turbocharge defense spending with cheap loans, fearing it would add to their
already heavy debt burdens.
The resistance, led by France, Italy and Spain, deals a significant setback to
Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s drive to boost Europe’s military
autonomy.
Her proposal, which includes a €150 billion loan package and an emergency clause
to loosen EU fiscal rules, was intended to unlock major new investments in
defense and reduce the bloc’s reliance on U.S. protection.
But the stalemate now risks derailing Brussels’ plan to funnel more weapons from
Europe to Ukraine.
“Some countries have serious doubts on the feasibility or even the possibility
of indebting [themselves] to these levels,” said a senior EU diplomat.
The diplomat, like others in this story, was granted anonymity to speak freely
about the plan and potential developments.
Heavily indebted countries in the south of Europe are instead ramping up demands
for so-called defense bonds — grants financed through common EU borrowing in
capital markets that must be unanimously approved by the bloc’s 27 countries.
“There’s this risk [of a fiasco] which could pave the way for defense bonds,”
said a non-Southern EU diplomat.
Von der Leyen has thus far stopped short of backing the idea given the likely
pushback from fiscally hawkish northern states such as Germany and the
Netherlands, which fear it could set a precedent for debt mutualization.
“No Eurobonds,” Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof reiterated after a gathering of
EU leaders last week.
A third EU diplomat signaled that the optics of Southern countries turning down
loans would undermine support for defense bonds among fiscally conservative
countries.
“No Eurobonds,” Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof reiterated after a gathering of
EU leaders last week. | Janos Kummer/Getty Images
“If they argue that defense is an existential challenge that justifies joint
debt, then they need to take the loans first,” said the diplomat, who hails from
the fiscally conservative bloc.
CLUB MED WANTS MORE
With Donald Trump threatening to cut off U.S. support for Ukraine and scolding
Europe over its military reliance on Washington, von der Leyen moved swiftly
following the U.S. president’s Jan. 20 inauguration to devise a plan to
reinforce the EU’s defense capabilities.
The resulting strategy included allowing member states to temporarily raise
defense spending by 1.5 percent of GDP over four years — and borrowing €150
billion on behalf of the EU to support joint weapons procurement and Ukraine
assistance.
The Commission hoped the loan-based scheme would be embraced, particularly by
larger southern economies like Italy and Spain that fall well short of NATO’s
2-percent-of-GDP defense spending target.
As recently as last week, Economy Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis predicted “a
large number of states activating this escape clause.”
But the Commission underestimated a crucial sticking point: While it can borrow
more cheaply than most member states, the loans it extends still count against
national debt levels — a red flag for highly indebted countries wary of spooking
markets or triggering fiscal penalties.
“Von der Leyen’s plan is almost exclusively based on national debt from states,”
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni told lawmakers last week.
The Commission has since acknowledged that national budgets would need to be cut
elsewhere to accommodate rising defense costs — a tough political sell in
countries whose citizens are more preoccupied with migration and climate change
than Russian tanks.
Italy and Spain specifically have pushed to widen the definition of defense
spending that can be exempted from EU fiscal rules — with Madrid proposing that
border control, cybersecurity and infrastructure resilience be included.
So far, however, neither Rome nor Madrid has confirmed whether they’ll invoke
the emergency clause. Some EU officials speculate they’re stalling in the hope
that von der Leyen will soften her stance on defense bonds ahead of the next
leaders’ summit in June.
“We should have more time [to decide],” Meloni told reporters last week, adding
that the proposed April time frame to activate the mechanism was “a bit too
close.”
“Von der Leyen’s plan is almost exclusively based on national debt from states,”
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni told lawmakers. | John Thys/Getty Images
France, meanwhile, has indicated it does not plan to activate the clause,
according to two EU diplomats. With a debt-to-GDP ratio above 110 percent, Paris
is wary of spooking markets or endangering its credit rating — a key factor in
how much it pays to borrow.
Germany, by contrast, is expected to activate the clause to help fund its
mammoth €500 billion defense upgrade. But like other triple-A rated states such
as Denmark and the Netherlands, Berlin is unlikely to accept Commission loans it
could raise more cheaply on its own.
That has compounded anxiety among more vulnerable member states, which fear that
by stepping up first to request EU loans they might signal financial weakness to
the markets — triggering higher borrowing costs.
Fragmentation among the EU’s 27 countries “makes a difference on the market
perception, which might be negative,” said the senior EU diplomat.
“If everyone doesn’t [submit the request] at the same time, the market will set
the limit” of how much you can spend, they added.
But fiscally conservative states are not buying that argument, with the third EU
diplomat accusing Southern states of “playing politics.”
(Jacopo Barigazzi contributed to this report)